nytimes.com
The claim that the new policy will cost taxpayers nothing is contradicted by the agency's own internal estimates.
@lons · Buried lede, on page B14.
4712
Clip the web. Annotate it in public.
Pull a quote from any article, YouTube video, or podcast. Add your take. Publish a permalink. The open comment section the web should have had.
Live
02How it works
Clip it. Annotate it. Publish it.
Three steps from “someone's wrong on the internet” to a permalink other people can argue under.
- 01nytimes.com
Pull the quote.
Highlight a paragraph from any article, grab a 90-second window of any YouTube video, or pull audio from a podcast.
- 02
The claim that the new policy will cost taxpayers nothing is contradicted by the agency's own internal estimates.
Your takeAdd your take.
Two sentences, a rebuttal, a fact-check, a thread starter. Anonymous if you want.
- 03nytimes.com
The claim that the new policy will cost taxpayers nothing is contradicted by the agency's own internal estimates.
@Jason · Buried lede, on page B14.012↳Get a permalink.
Every clip becomes a page people (and LLMs) can link to, vote on, and reply under.
03What you can do
What you can do with Annotated.
Clip an article, clip a YouTube video, see who else has annotated the page you're reading. The features that make the web argue-able in public.
- YOUTUBEannotated.com240p0:001:30 CLIP4:32
Clip 90 seconds of any video.
Pull the exact moment that mattered. We re-encode at 240p and burn the source URL onto the frame so fair use stays honest.
- ARTICLEStheatlantic.comarticleA buried paragraph on page B14“
Pull a paragraph from anything you read.
Highlight up to a hundred words on any page. Your selection becomes a quotable card with a permalink back to the source.
- EXTENSIONyoutube.com/watch?v=...ANNOTATIONS0@maya2dDisputes the 8% claim from para 3.@drew4hConnects this to the 2019 ruling.@anon12mNumbers don't add up. Source?
See who got there first.
Open any URL and the sidebar shows every annotation anyone has made on it. No more wondering if someone already wrote the take you were about to write.
- LEADERBOARDSOURCES#1nytimes.comURLS#1/opinion/...ANNOTATORS#1@mayaCHANNELS#1@LexFridman
See what the crowd is clipping.
Top sources, top URLs, top annotators, top channels. The leaderboard surfaces the most-discussed media of the week instead of whatever an algorithm wants to feed you.
- MEGA THREADURL THREADnytimes.com/2026/04/opinion/budget-math.html0
- @harper6mo agoFIRST3 repliesThe original take. Worth re-reading after the new ruling.
- @drew2mo ago2 repliesUpdates the count. The 11-point gap is now 14.
- @maya3w ago1 replyPulls the AP correction issued two weeks later.
- @anon1d agoConnects the dots to the Senate filing.
Every annotation of a URL, on one page.
Find out who annotated a New York Times article, what they said, who replied, and who got there first. Each source URL has its own permanent thread anyone can dig through.